Op/Ed: Money Can’t Buy You Health

"Healthcare" is supposed to be a big election issue: politicians promise universal and equal "healthcare," or prevent it from being taken away. Everyone wants to be healthy, and a $3 trillion industry wants to keep the money flowing.

So, I have a confession to make as a doctor: I don't think I have ever kept anybody healthy. If someone comes to me asking for "health maintenance," I don't have a shot of "health" to give, or a prescription for "health" to be filled at your neighborhood Walgreens, CVS, or Rite-Aid.

And as a patient, I can't recall any ways in which doctors kept me healthy, although they did save my life by taking out my appendix, and they treated some illnesses and injuries. I am very grateful to them, and whatever I paid them seemed reasonable and well worth it.


Beltway Insider: Trump/Queen Toast, Brits Protest, D-Day Anniversary, PM Hopefuls Implode, Manafort Headed to Rikers, Dr. John


To my mind, a healthy person is one who does not have to see a "healthcare provider" regularly or take medicine every day, and who can go to work, take care of family, and generally lead an active life.

We hear endless complaints about how we spend too much money treating sickness instead of preventing it. If only we had the government take all the money, plus trillions more, and "invest" it in health, we wouldn't have to spend so much, and everyone would be healthier—so they say.

This was the rationale for the National Health Service in Britain. Once the NHS took care of the backlog of untreated illnesses, much of the need for it would melt away. This did not happen. Expenditures kept rising and were never enough. The backlogs and waiting lists grew. Ambulances circle emergency departments, and patients are crammed into hallways and storage rooms.

Suppose you go for your government-funded, "value-based" health maintenance visit. Details of your once-private life will be entered into a very expensive electronic health record. (For most people, it will be their own data, but occasionally someone else's will be cut-and-pasted in, causing endless trouble.)

You will be checked for diabetes or pre-diabetes, hypertension or pre-hypertension, tobacco use, cholesterol, in many cases gun ownership, body mass index, and other government-mandated items. You will get educated about the evils of tobacco (in case you have been on Mars and hadn't heard). You'll be lectured about obesity if your BMI is too high. You'll very likely get a prescription to lower your blood pressure or cholesterol, and you may get vaccinated for something.


World News: Benny Gantz Cosmetically Shifts Center-Right in attempt to 'Trump Netanyahu's Ace'


Your provider will likely get a bonus for checking all the right boxes and for "keeping you healthy," and will get penalized if your "numbers" don't improve or you get sick. Since I don't think others are any better than I am at creating health, there is a huge incentive to "manage the case mix" to discourage unhealthy or noncompliant patients from joining the practice.

People on drugs for blood pressure or cholesterol may feel worse rather than better but are supposed to be less likely to have a heart attack or stroke decades later. Studies with huge numbers of patients, who may be very different from you, have shown a decrease in such events with treatment. So far, a decrease in expenditures has not been shown, in view of the cost of all the drugs and side effects.

Of course, as an internist I treat high blood pressure and diabetes, but I consider this to be disease management. Would better diet prevent these things? Possibly, but what diet? I recommended low-fat diets for years. This government-approved advice is now questioned.


World News: Emmanuel Macron and .... the Others


So how would government-funded primary care have prevented the diseases my patients have had? Heart failure? (Statin drugs probably make it worse.)

Heart attacks? (When the patient has one, it is too late to prevent it.)

Stroke? (Preventive aspirin is now criticized because of the bleeding it may cause.)

Osteoarthritis? (We have great joint replacements but are much better at blocking access to surgery than at curing the arthritis.)

Gall bladder disease, cancer, pneumonia, blood clots, thyroid disease, cataracts, arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, herniated disks, asthma, endocarditis from drug abuse, on and on. If we put all the doctors to work pretending to keep people healthy, who would treat disease and injury?

Healing the sick is what medicine is about. The politicians who promise to "fix healthcare" can only destroy medicine—while bankrupting the country.

 

 

Bio:Jane M. Orient, M.D. obtained her undergraduate degrees in chemistry and mathematics from the University of Arizona in Tucson, and her M.D. from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1974. She completed an internal medicine residency at Parkland Memorial Hospital and University of Arizona Affiliated Hospitals and then became an Instructor at the University of Arizona College of Medicine and a staff physician at the Tucson Veterans Administration Hospital.

She has been in solo private practice since 1981 and has served as Executive Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) since 1989. She is currently president of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness. She is the author of YOUR Doctor Is Not In: Healthy Skepticism about National Healthcare, and the second through fifth editions of Sapira's Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis published by Wolters Kluwer.

She authored books for schoolchildren, Professor Klugimkopf's Old-Fashioned English Grammar and Professor Klugimkopf's Spelling Method, published by Robinson Books, and coauthored two novels published as Kindle books, Neomorts and Moonshine. More than 100 of her papers have been published in the scientific and popular literature on a variety of subjects including risk assessment, natural and technological hazards and nonhazards, and medical economics and ethics. She is the editor of AAPS News, the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness Newsletter, and Civil Defense Perspectives, and is the managing editor of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

Haute Tease

  • Impressionist and Modern Art Auction Provides Stunning Surprises

    The Impressionist and Modern Auction hosted by the International Art House Sotheby's at an invitation only rare evening event, did not disappoint as robust bidding from all corners of the world elevated the sale achievement to over $350,000,000.

     
  • Celebrity Interview: Director Gavin Hood Talks on the Making of Official Secrets, Casting, and Loyalty

    Gavin Hood, co-writer and director of Official Secrets, the contemporary espionage thriller chronicling the leak of a top-secret memo, the subsequent arrest and trial of British Spy Katherine Gun recently spoke with Haute-Lifestyle.com Publisher Janet Walker.

     
  • Lukas Nelson Debuts New Music Video For "The View"

    The official music video for Lukas Nelson's song, "The View," is debuting today. Directed and edited by Orion Owens, the video features footage from across the island of Maui, where Nelson grew up. Watch/share HERE 

  • World News: The Post Putin Era and the Floodgate

    If Vladimir Putin's power trembled without collapsing under the blow of the Wagners, the abortive attempt at overthrow nevertheless opens the perspective of the post-Putin era that has become inevitable. But for which regime to come?

     
  • Accessories: The Most Important Questions to Ask a Jeweler

    Working with a custom jeweler can be intimidating if shoppers aren’t sure which questions are important, here are a few tips to customers so they will feel confident knowing the questions to ask a jeweler during consultations.

     
  • Du Point Mort à la Sixième?

    Le recours par le Gouvernement à l’article 49.3 afin d’adopter la réforme des retraites met en évidence les limites constitutionnelles d’une République désormais inadaptée aux attentes des citoyens. D’une crise politique, la France est passée à une crise de régime.